Big Dick McGee
If you don't know, now ya know
If there ever was an argument in favor of having a viable 3rd party, the current state of the Democratic Party is certainly a compelling one.
Of course, as most of you know, I vote Republican. I am a social Libertarian, and a a fiscal conservative. Basically, I favor little to no government involvement in people's personal lives, and feel that the less beauracracy the better. I could care less who you marry, what you do with your unborn fetus, or how you want to live your life (provided you are an American citizen...but my illegal immigrant post will come later). I just don't want to have to pay to support you with liberal handout programs.
It fascinates me that the Dems can't capitalize on a polarizing President like George W. Bush. If you believe polls, his approval rating is the lowest of all time, the majority of Americans are against the war in Iraq, and they believe him to be a cartoonish bufoon. IF you believe polls (a big if, since different media outlets tell different stories based on their inherent bias), this election should be basically teed up for the Dems.
And yet, the most viable candidates they can produce are Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton? A senator with little experience, who never elucidates his policies beyond sound bites (Obama), and a senator who waffles almost as much as Kerry, and who is routinely plays the race card while coming off as an entitled bitch (HRC).
The fact that it's May 14th and there is still no clear front-runner for the Democratic nomination shows that the party is so consumed with infighting and power brokering that they've lost sight of the bigger picture. Each candidate claims victory with each new primary, but neither sees that, when polled against McCain, they haven't a prayer of winning. Well, that's not entirely true. Polls show that Clinton has a better shot of beating McCain. Yet and still, Obama won't drop out and do what's best for his party.
I do not agree with all of Senator McCain's platform. His energy policy is a joke, his views on global warming are a thin attempt to court Dems, and some of his social views are far too liberal for me. But by and large, his fiscal policies are more in line with mine, and I can live with the disagreements I, have.
Does anyone really think Obama-with no experience, no clear-cut explanations as to how he will implement his policies-or Clinton, a classic tax-and-spend Liberal, has a shot to beat McCain? You're fooling yourself.
Is anyone truly still a die-hard supporter of the Democratic party after this fiasco?
Of course, as most of you know, I vote Republican. I am a social Libertarian, and a a fiscal conservative. Basically, I favor little to no government involvement in people's personal lives, and feel that the less beauracracy the better. I could care less who you marry, what you do with your unborn fetus, or how you want to live your life (provided you are an American citizen...but my illegal immigrant post will come later). I just don't want to have to pay to support you with liberal handout programs.
It fascinates me that the Dems can't capitalize on a polarizing President like George W. Bush. If you believe polls, his approval rating is the lowest of all time, the majority of Americans are against the war in Iraq, and they believe him to be a cartoonish bufoon. IF you believe polls (a big if, since different media outlets tell different stories based on their inherent bias), this election should be basically teed up for the Dems.
And yet, the most viable candidates they can produce are Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton? A senator with little experience, who never elucidates his policies beyond sound bites (Obama), and a senator who waffles almost as much as Kerry, and who is routinely plays the race card while coming off as an entitled bitch (HRC).
The fact that it's May 14th and there is still no clear front-runner for the Democratic nomination shows that the party is so consumed with infighting and power brokering that they've lost sight of the bigger picture. Each candidate claims victory with each new primary, but neither sees that, when polled against McCain, they haven't a prayer of winning. Well, that's not entirely true. Polls show that Clinton has a better shot of beating McCain. Yet and still, Obama won't drop out and do what's best for his party.
I do not agree with all of Senator McCain's platform. His energy policy is a joke, his views on global warming are a thin attempt to court Dems, and some of his social views are far too liberal for me. But by and large, his fiscal policies are more in line with mine, and I can live with the disagreements I, have.
Does anyone really think Obama-with no experience, no clear-cut explanations as to how he will implement his policies-or Clinton, a classic tax-and-spend Liberal, has a shot to beat McCain? You're fooling yourself.
Is anyone truly still a die-hard supporter of the Democratic party after this fiasco?
