"Do As You're Told."

[The Question]

Poor Ol' Sniffer...

 

[jack]

 

[The Question]

 

[jack]

There's always simple assault, in your cases

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/a...-club-has-been-charged/ar-BB1bgVDf?li=BBnbfcL

 

[The Question]

^^The above meme crystalized what had been bothering me about this whole thing.

I Aim To Misbehave

Don’t get into the car. (Don’t know what I mean? Read this and you will.)

mbdtr.com

 

[The Question]

 

[The Question]

 

[jack]

 

[The Question]

Right. It's just like being under house arrest. Without a trial. Without having committed a crime.

 

[jack]

I don't see where you get that. I go out when I want to. Walk my dogs twice a day s I need to. Hike in the woods when I want to. Ride my bike or skate or ski when I like. Drive my car to the post office and do errands when I need to. Interact with live people outdoors wearing masks and social distancing. It's called respecting your neighbors.

Certianly 200,000 new sick people along with over 1,000 dead people a day can't be wrong about this.

 

[The Question]

People get sick every day. People die every day. Know something interesting? According to a study out of Johns Hopkins, the rate of deaths this year is just about the same as the rate of deaths from 2018. The Yellow Plague claimed a lot more than in 2018, obviously. But you know what's interesting? Heart disease, the leading cause of death in 2018 just as it's been for just about forever... claimed exactly the same number less.

Isn't that weird? It's almost like the difference in deaths was just being put down to COVID instead of to, ohhh, I dunno, the actual causes of death.

I'd provide a link to substantiate that, but why bother. We both know you wouldn't read it.

 

[jack]

Here's some John Hopkins data for you, motherfucker.

 

[jack]

Really, you CAN'T be this stupid.

 

[The Question]

 

[The Question]

UPDATED: Johns Hopkins Retracts Article Saying COVID-19 Has 'Relatively No Effect on Deaths' in U.S.

pjmedia.com

You will now proceed, as per your usual course, to not read. Because you take what comes from totally discredited establishment media sources on faith, while utterly refusing to even read anything from outside those sources.

Like a religious fundie would.

 

[jack]

LOL I've been following that story since it broke. You forgot this (conveniently). Since you posted the first, why didn't you do the follow up? Because you're sloppy that's why.

https://retractionwatch.com/2020/11...y-members-presentation-about-covid-19-deaths/

 

[The Question]

LOL I've been following that story since it broke. You forgot this (conveniently). Since you posted the first, why didn't you do the follow up? Because you're sloppy that's why.

https://retractionwatch.com/2020/11...y-members-presentation-about-covid-19-deaths/

And that's how I know my prediction was right; you didn't read the link I posted. Because it also points out what you just said. Yes, I am keeping up. You, on the other hand, are not.

 

[jack]

Stop talking for me. I did read your stupid link. It includes a reference right to the article that rebukes your bullshit. You're making yourself look stupid now. I suspect it's the meth talking, given how erratic your posting behavior has become.

SLOPPY. Now fuck off. You've lost this argument. Don't wear your mask. If you get sick, no one will care fuckface.

 

[The Question]

Lockdowns have no measurable effect.

Lockdowns Not Linked With Lower COVID Death Rates, New Study Finds | Jon Miltimore

Researchers analyzed data from 160 countries over the first 8 months of the pandemic. “Stringency of the measures settled to fight pandemia, including lockdown, did not appear to be linked with death rate,” the researchers concluded.

fee.org

Not that you care. You're so eager to submit and obey that you don't even need a credible excuse.

I suspect it's the meth talking, given how erratic your posting behavior has become.

Having to resort to baseless fabrications now, eh? Pathetic. No, wait -- you didn't even make that shit up on your own. That's actually beyond pathetic.

At least come up with slander of your own, you pitiful paedo.

 

[jack]

He said slandering me twice in the last two posts.

You pathetic loser hypocrite go sit in your own stink, and don't overcook your next batch. You never know where the next hit is coming from. Don't deny it. It's obvious to me what your real problem is.