Get your booty to the polls

[The Question]

You can't win this, Jack. Try though you may to buck reality, reality is not on your side, here. The case has merit. It has substance, backed as it is by literally 4/5ths of the states of the union. SCOTUS isn't going to just toss it, like you hope they will, and the facts are on the plaintiffs' side -- those four states, as a matter of fact, altered their voting rules unconstitutionally.

That's a fact. That's why the case is a matter of law, not a matter of fact, because the facts of the case aren't even in dispute.

If SCOTUS rules in accordance with the Constitution -- which is all but assured with ACB on the bench now -- those four states will either see the power of choosing their electors passed back to their GOP legislatures, or see their electors vacated.

Either way, Biden loses that 270. Then it goes to Congress for a procedural election, in which case the Congressional Republicans, who outnumber the Congressional Democrats, hand the election to Trump.

Don't believe me now. It's more fun if you believe me later.

But nah. You just keep your indoctrinated pedal to the dogmatic metal. Slam into the brick wall that is reality.

 

[jack]

Erm you've called me every manner of homophobic and racist insult and haven't cited a single true fact. Suitcases under tables? LOL Vote dumps in the middle of the night? LOL You're a fraud, and you're backing a fraud. I on the other hand have done nothing but cite fact after fact after fact. The SC is about to teach you and all you traitors and seditionists a nice lesson.

I will post again in this thread after the Supreme Court rules, and not until. Until then suck it, Commie.

 

[The Question]

you've called me every manner of homophobic and racist insult

No, I've called you a dumb ('cause you keep demonstrating that you are), gay (which beyond literally referring to a homosexual is a slur meaning that you're just generally lame, which you keep demonstrating that you are) wannabe Kapo (Kapos being Jewish collaborators with the SS staff in concentration camps, and what with you supporting Socialists is just not that far off the mark.)

Don't wanna be called a dumb, gay, wannabe Kapo bastard? Well, that's easy enough to fix: Quit being one.

 

[Loktar]

Democratic Socialists are like "Democratic Fascists." It's just window dressing. A pathetically thin veneer to try to hide what they really are.

And no, nationalists aren't "national Socialists." National Socialists are Socialists. AKA Communists.

I'd retort with "nice try", but it wasn't a nice try. It sucked.

That's just what Nazi scum would say.

 

[The Question]

I will post again in this thread after the Supreme Court rules, and not until.

Again? Lyin' ass Jew boy, did you forget you've said that before?

 

[The Question]

That's just what Nazi scum would say.

No, actually, it isn't. Nazis were proud to be nazis. The "Neo-" version still are proud of it. Only the pussy version of Communists try to lie about what they are.

 

[Loktar]

No, actually, it isn't. Nazis were proud to be nazis. The "Neo-" version still are proud of it. Only the pussy version of Communists try to lie about what they are.

So you're proud to be a Nazi. Got it. Us pussy Commies will continue to deny what you falsely label us. Thanks for clearing that up.

 

[The Question]

Nope. I'm not any brand of Socialist -- National, "Democratic" or otherwise. Lame try, though.

Us pussy Commies will continue to deny what you falsely label us.

It's not a false label. Aside from the fact that you just self-applied it, you back a guy you know won't make it halfway through a single term, you know he'll be replaced by a woman left of a self-described Socialist (which is pussy for Communist), and you still support that.

So either you're knowingly supporting a Communist soft revolution in this country, or you're just a towering imbecile. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt by assuming that you're knowingly and willfully supporting Communism. Would you rather I assume that you're so stupid that you don't know that's what you're supporting?

 

[Loktar]

Nope. I'm not any brand of Socialist -- National, "Democratic" or otherwise. Lame try, though.



It's not a false label. Aside from the fact that you just self-applied it, you back a guy you know won't make it halfway through a single term, you know he'll be replaced by a woman left of a self-described Socialist (which is pussy for Communist), and you still support that.

So either you're knowingly supporting a Communist soft revolution in this country, or you're just a towering imbecile. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt by assuming that you're knowingly and willfully supporting Communism. Would you rather I assume that you're so stupid that you don't know that's what you're supporting?

I know what I'm supporting, just like you know your supporting an Orange Nazi, Kkk loving, misogynist, imbecilic racist.

 

[jack]

LOL
I'm glad I never took meth. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/s...lenging-bidens-victory/ar-BB1bRm9c?li=BBnb7Kz

 

[jack]

I just cant stop smiling

 

[jack]

https://time.com/5752114/nazi-military-drugs/

 

[The Question]

Orange Nazi, Kkk loving, misogynist, imbecilic racist.

Blaw, blaw, blaw, blaw, blaw. Meaningless blather.

As for the Texas v Pennsylvania case, we're looking at an impending civil war.

Unless the signed ruling contravenes the unsigned ruling, you're going to see a civil war over this. Texas is already talking secession.

 

[Loktar]

Blaw, blaw, blaw, blaw, blaw. Meaningless blather.

As for the Texas v Pennsylvania case, we're looking at an impending civil war.

Unless the signed ruling contravenes the unsigned ruling, you're going to see a civil war over this. Texas is already talking secession.

Good Riddance Texas. Forget the Alamo. Take your lameass Dallas Cowboys with you. Marry your cousins you redneck, drunken cowboy sons of bitches.

 

[jack]

Like I said Lox, he's one sore loser.

bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

 

[jack]

Blaw, blaw, blaw, blaw, blaw. Meaningless blather.

As for the Texas v Pennsylvania case, we're looking at an impending civil war.

Unless the signed ruling contravenes the unsigned ruling, you're going to see a civil war over this. Texas is already talking secession.

LOL shut up loser. He lost. Get over it.

 

[jack]

Again? Lyin' ass Jew boy, did you forget you've said that before?

Racist losers gotta racist I guess.

Loser

 

[jack]

Sure got quiet around here quick. Losers never admit they were wrong after all.

I got a feeling Dems will be talking about 14th Amendment coming up

 

[jack]

 

[jack]

LOL like all other losers, can't even admit he was wrong