EnglishRose
addle barn
damn I keep forgetting - HF = Big bad...sorry I'll try and remember
My rep went to hell a long time ago sweetie
chipper730 said:At least it's not Teletubbies.
chipper730 said:Pride.
Cardie said:I've been on vacation since HF was suspended, and I forgot to take along the SL password, so I have no idea what's been discussed in there since July 1. I was privy to some of the preliminary discussions concerning his dual.
Here's the staff's dilemma. It goes beyond simply being absolutely consistent in how we treat those who create dual accounts, something clearly spelled out in the latest guidelines. It goes to setting ourselves up for not being able to protect the board from duals at all. If we had contacted HF and let him explain that he just forgot his password, he would have told us that was the problem and all would be fine, many say. Yet he has a new email address we can't verify as being his, and he has never behaved as one might expect someone who has been away a long time and can't log in to behave.
Say I forget my password and even my user name. Maybe I'm eager to get back on and don't use proper procedures. But the whole point of creating that new account has to be because I want to post. I'd beon in a flash, saying. "Hi guys this is HF back from a long exile and I forgot my password, so I'm now calling myself Duncan. How is everyone." Yet Duncan never posts at all and soon HF's memory of his password returns.
Maybe the staff has become paranoid, but wouldn't this strike you as suspicious?
Wouldn't you further fear that this might be a new way to create dual accounts, because as long as someone had previously had an account and password here, the tendency would be to accept the "OOps I forgot" excuse from a well known former member should the dual be discovered.
That was the original red flag. I'm sure that Orph's researches uncovered far more reasons to be concerned before the suspension was issued. And if HF refuses to communicate directly and privately with the staff
--even if it was a lapse of ettiquette perhaps not to contact him first, then there is no way to resolve the issue. And that leads me to believe that whoever created the Duncan dual doesn't want it to be resolved and is acting out of malicious motivations.
Cardie
G1223 said:Now as to my personal feligns towards him. HF was using as a signature a posting I made about him. I was not misquoted. Nor has this changed how I feel towards him.
Anistashia said:This just occurred to me. Why didn't HF, as soon as he remembered his PW, contact one of the admins by PM or even by posting a thread? He could have said something like "By the way, when I couldn't remember my PW I started another account with Duncan as my user name. You can go ahead and close that now." Had he done something like that even he might never have gotten suspended.
Rhea said:1. If he'd followed the instructions on the first page you get when not logged in, and e-mailed the admins for his password and mentioned his change in e-mail.
2. He could have 'fessed up after that and they wouldn't have suspended him, they would likely have simply deleted the dual.
Anastashia said:He posted for days after getting back in though. If he had done what I said immediatley upon remembering his PW he potentially could have avoided the staff wasting their time investigating the possible dual and he getting suspended.
Originally Posted by Anistashia
This just occurred to me. Why didn't HF, as soon as he remembered his PW, contact one of the admins by PM or even by posting a thread? He could have said something like "By the way, when I couldn't remember my PW I started another account with Duncan as my user name. You can go ahead and close that now." Had he done something like that even he might never have gotten suspended.
Cardie said:Spidey, because of the many duals we found planted among the member rolls when Orpheus took over upgrading board security, we decided to make having a dual account a suspendable offense in and of itself. It's announced everywhere a new registrant could possibly look. One could argue that "banking" accounts so that one can stay on the board after being suspended or can role-play by pretending to be three different people who argue with each other is harmless. We concluded otherwise. The staff decided that we would not have duals here. This proposal was ratified by the membership. We are not required to prove malicious intent. And there are furthermore too many suspicious circumstances about this dual to enable me to accept the excuse that's been given for creating it.
Orpheus said:I would like to clarify one or two points:
All accounts undergo some quick checks before approval. The Duncan account was not approved, so HF *couldn't* (e.g.) post with it if he wanted to. He did, however, log in in the days following his application, and used the limited functionality available while awaiting authorization-- e.g. 2049 EDT Thursday, June 21, to cite a specific example.
It is precisely because of this preliminary check that we post, very prominently, that attempting to register a dual is considered a very serious offense. We obviously won't catch every dual up front, but we obviously aren't going to approve the duals we do catch. If the attempt weren't an offense, people might feel free to repeatedly *try* to break the rule, and just shrug and argue "You can't do anything to me, because I didn't succeed" if caught by the preliminary screening. IMHO, he "registered" within the intent of the rule.
As I stated earlier, warnings were posted on three pages which he viewed: in bold near the top of the guest main page (which he read for 1 min 18 secs at 2359 EDT, Tuesday, June 19), near the top of the Terms of Registration (which he read at 2316 EDT, Tuesday, June 19 -- and which require the applicant to check a box reading "I have read, understood and agree to these rules and conditions" before proceeding) and on *multiple places on the Guidelines page (which he specifically viewed by clicking the link at the top of the page on his own initiative at 2303 EDT Tuesday, June 19)
I consider that rule, and its stated consequences, to be quite clear and prominently posted. Rov won't give me the budget for singing telegrams.
RuReddy said:You could be a dual just pretending, not hard to do in a place like this. Hmmmmm
If you want to consider 'nitwit' expletive and foul-mouthed go ahead little fella, knock yourself out.
I think the same about you here as I do there.
HeroicFool said:Gode, please explain how an e-mail can be sent in "error".
HeroicFool said:I don't feel ashamed of my actions, you on the other hand, should.