Messenger said:
That might be what it is, but that isn't what it's advertised as.
My point exactly. Advertising doesn't mean squat, or my favorite beer would consistently get me laid by hot girls in bikinis...
You really might want to revise this, or at least elaborate on it.
For the purposes of this discussion, no. That would bore everyone out of the thread. The short version: people "select" how they wish to be governed by voting-for or against their favorite lawmaker, and for or against a proposed tax amendment (school tax hikes are a good example). Once the votes are in, the lawmaker (whose salary is paid for in part via collected taxes) helps to govern the people of the nation by attempting to gather some of the collected tax money for his or her own constituents. In this way we are "choosing" the way we are governed. The recent elections are a dramatic example of this I think.
Taxes are meant to comprise A) Funds needed for public services and infrastructure, and B) The administrative costs of maintaining the government. In any case, it isn't the 'government's money.'
This is what I have been saying all along, with the difference that if a tax payment is required by law, as taxes are, then it is NOT in fact your money once it's gone. It's theirs, no matter how you want to squint at it in theory.
Not quite. The reality is that the government has to actively hide expentitures which the public wouldn't be happy with. Why? Because the money belongs to the taxpayers, not the government. If it is in reality 'government money' (Who's heard that term?) then the government wouldn't be subject to public scrutiny.
This is more because our particular form of government is designed to give us much more power to replace or eject a bad leader. In point of fact, the American people almost NEVER want to approve of taxation. If our leaders came right out and admitted everything they waste those dollars on, the public would scream bloody murder as a kneejerk reaction and that guy would be gone with the next vote. That's why negative ads always use the spectre of higher taxes so effectively. The very concept of not having control of "your tax dollars at work" sends people into a tizzy, as evidenced here.
Plenty of people have opted out of paying the illegal income tax foistered on the American citizen. Other taxes come in the form of sales tax, etc, and can't be avoided unless you wish to become totally self-sufficient.
Sure, Al Capone comes to mind. We're arguing semantics here. The vast majority of Americans pay income tax or face substantial penalties up to and including jail time. And NO ONE by your own admission is totally exempt from any sort of tax. Becoming self sufficient, while decidedly utopian and almost communistic, would be impossible in reality. Why? Because self-sufficient, autonomous communities make the Government nervous. Ask those Branch Davidians how that works out when the Government gets nervous...
And missmanners doesn't count. She's Amish.