Welcome Wordforge posters

[jack]

Read again. I mentioned other criteria such as I true and harmful for "critical gender theory". What ever I feel about religion as an atheist I recognize attacking one of the world"s largest religions over spurious claims is not viable or valuable especially since it has redeeming features of doing a hell of a lot of good on the world compared to a tiny amount of harm plus they actually do punish most offenders. The balance with made up and factually untrue nonsense like false gender theory is 3xqc4ly the opposite. It factually makes untrue claims, there are factually only two genders, and no one can actually change their sex. It is still just man in woman face.

Our business is concluded. Take your ignorance and stuff it up your backside til it comes out your nostrils.

Bye.

 

[jack]

Don't choke on any kernels now, y'hear? Why are people such fucking idiots? The ignorance in this thread (especially the last page or so) is palpable.

 

[jack]

So you think eradicating Catholicism in Public Life would only be wrong because you believe it would be unconstitutional?

Any other group you feel isn’t protected by the constitution is fair game for eradication?

Thank you.

 

[The Question]

You're a fucking idiot, and have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.

Doubling down on ignorance means you look twice as stupid..

No, he isn't. He's not even wrong. Trannies are way more likely than normal people to be kiddie fiddlers. It's empirically proven. Now, the fact that you don't like it, well, can't help you. Dislike the truth all you want, that doesn't change a damned thing.

Half of all transgender prisoners are sex offenders or dangerous category A inmates • Fair Play For Women

The government is not recording transgender prisoners systematically. We analysed the data: half of trans 'women' inmates are high-risk.

fairplayforwomen.com

 

[jack]

No, he isn't. He's not even wrong. Trannies are way more likely than normal people to be kiddie fiddlers. It's empirically proven. Now, the fact that you don't like it, well, can't help you. Dislike the truth all you want, that doesn't change a damned thing.

Half of all transgender prisoners are sex offenders or dangerous category A inmates • Fair Play For Women

The government is not recording transgender prisoners systematically. We analysed the data: half of trans 'women' inmates are high-risk.

fairplayforwomen.com

 

[The Question]

Awww, I know. The truth: so tiresome, so unfashionable. So immutable. You'll have an easier time resisting the Crackpot Brigade than you will resisting the truth, though.

 

[jack]

No, he isn't. He's not even wrong. Trannies are way more likely than normal people to be kiddie fiddlers. It's empirically proven. Now, the fact that you don't like it, well, can't help you. Dislike the truth all you want, that doesn't change a damned thing.

Half of all transgender prisoners are sex offenders or dangerous category A inmates • Fair Play For Women

The government is not recording transgender prisoners systematically. We analysed the data: half of trans 'women' inmates are high-risk.

fairplayforwomen.com

btw, "trannies" are generally not transgender, which means you really don't know what you're talking about.

When you mislabel a group to "prove your point" you really haven't made a point at all.

And he IS wrong. btw the study you quoted was a "talk therapy" study done on 29 TG inmates. The ones that actually completed SRS.

and...the total TG prison population is around 5000. Meanwhile,

In total, roughly 1.9 million people are incarcerated in the United States, 803,000 people are on parole, and a staggering 2.9 million people are on probation.Mar 14, 2023

of those 2 million, roughly 97 percent were abused as children. Not by "trannies" either.

What a fucking disconnect you suffer from.

 

[jack]

Are transgendered people prone to sexual perversion or
pedophilia?

No. This is unsubstantiated and misinformed 'fact' that is used to
falsely discredit transgenders. Human nature often views someone
who is different or exotic as potentially a threat, and thus suspect. It is
always based on lack of, or very limited exposure to actual individuals
of that group.

 

[The Question]

btw, "trannies" are generally not transgender, which means you really don't know what you're talking about.

Um... I've kinda said that. There's no such thing as 'transgender', just transvestites who go all in by chugging hormones and (very occasionally) having medical personnel mutilate their junk. But they're still genetically the sex of their birth.

So, yeah, kinda do know what I'm talking about, despite the fact that you don't like my conclusion.

 

[The Question]

Are transgendered people prone to sexual perversion or
pedophilia?

No. This is unsubstantiated and misinformed 'fact' that is used to
falsely discredit transgenders. Human nature often views someone
who is different or exotic as potentially a threat, and thus suspect. It is
always based on lack of, or very limited exposure to actual individuals
of that group.

Wrong.

https://www.womenarehuman.com/transgender-sexual-offending-context-is-all/

 

[jack]

Um... I've kinda said that. There's no such thing as 'transgender', just transvestites who go all in by chugging hormones and (very occasionally) having medical personnel mutilate their junk. But they're still genetically the sex of their birth.

So, yeah, kinda do know what I'm talking about, despite the fact that you don't like my conclusion.

No you kinda dont know what youre talking about. When you mischaracterise a group to fit your narrative and then misquote actual statistics you got nothing.

 

[jack]

Wrong.

https://www.womenarehuman.com/transgender-sexual-offending-context-is-all/

Not wrong. Even DSV agrees.
You're not a doctor.
Stop misquoting actual psychology.
And please stop with the red herring links.

 

[The Question]

No you kinda dont know what youre talking about. When you mischaracterise a group to fit your narrative and then misquote actual statistics you got nothing.

Okay, then, I'll bite: how many medical practitioners are out there engaging in genetic editing to turn XY chromosomal pairs into XX chromosomal pairs?

Because until that's what "transgenders" are doing? It's just crossdressing. And, yeah, they do have a higher tendency to molest kids. On the order of Catholic priests higher.

 

[jack]

Transgender exists. But lumping crossdressers in is where the fail in this discussion occurs. Worse are your incorrect assumptions about the dysphoria and pedophilia.

Just wrong.

 

[jack]

Okay, then, I'll bite: how many medical practitioners are out there engaging in genetic editing to turn XY chromosomal pairs into XX chromosomal pairs?

Because until that's what "transgenders" are doing? It's just crossdressing. And, yeah, they do have a higher tendency to molest kids. On the order of Catholic priests higher.

It happens in the womb actually. And you're floating again.

 

[The Question]

No, transgender does not exist. Not in mammals, anyway. At all. I get that you don't like it; that doesn't make it incorrect.

Shocking footage of 'family friendly' drag queen show in front of kids

A drag queen appeared to be performing at a 'family friendly' event. Young kids were present as the sexually suggestive moves were made on a catwalk with the drag queen spreading their legs.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[jack]

Has nothing to do with what I "like". Has more to do with what I "know".

What you're talking about is incorrect. Not based on anything but junk science and leaps of logic. You're entitled to your opinion. Im entitled to disagree with it.

 

[The Question]

Not based on anything but junk science and leaps of logic.

Yeah, if you're going to label evolutionary biology as "junk science", they're pulling out a chair for you over at the Young Earth Creationists' table.

 

[jack]

Scientific American agrees with me. They state unequivocally that using XX and XY as the definition of sex is incorrect. Look it up. Or ill post the link when I get home.

 

[Loktar]

Yeah, if you're going to label evolutionary biology as "junk science", they're pulling out a chair for you over at the Young Earth Creationists' table.

Men dressing as women is evolutionary biology? I is confused. At worse they are man children still playing dress up or they really like Halloween and practice it every day.

I was dressing up as a woman last night in my apartment. Are you saying that if I went out still dressed as a woman to the local library and read a book to a child i would be grooming them and a threat to that child? Bullshit.