Menu
What's new
Troll Kingdom

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Welcome Wordforge posters

I used your term searching "does evolutionary biology claim there is no such thing as transgender in humans?" The quote is from the scientific american article from the search.

So you're incorrect about that too.
 
Loktar said:
Men dressing as women is evolutionary biology? I is confused. At worse they are man children still playing dress up or they really like Halloween and practice it every day.

I was dressing up as a woman last night in my apartment. Are you saying that if I went out still dressed as a woman to the local library and read a book to a child i would be grooming them and a threat to that child? Bullshit.
Click to expand...
You didn't actually believe you are a woman, though, do ya. That's the difference.

And, no, I don't think you get all 'got up' in misogynistic clown wear and go normalize that shit to kids.
 
jack said:
I used your term searching "does evolutionary biology claim there is no such thing as transgender in humans?" The quote is from the scientific american article from the search.

So you're incorrect about that too.
Click to expand...
Oh, for fuck's sake. How many bucks knock their antlers off and try to pass as does?

None. Mammalian sexual dimorphism is a biological fact. Go fuckin' cry about it. Or... I don't know what Young Earth Creationists do. Go put on a sweater vest and pray about it, or somethin'. Ya fuggin Ned Flanders wannabe. lol
 
So if haggard dudes can just decide that they are grotesque caricatures of women, what about other "play pretend" fantasies? Where does Jack draw the line and go, "No, that's TOO stupid."?

Transracialism? Rachel Dolezal was a negress because she just really wanted to be one? Does that sit right with you?

How about transspeciesism? Y'know, the furry faggots who go all in and actually believe that they are anthropomorphic lower life forms?

Where do you draw the line and just throw up your hands and admit that these crackpots are fuckin' crackpots?
 
Hmm red and olive colobus monkeys can and do change sex during puberty. Spotted hyenas have both sets of genitalia both males and females. And even lions are transgender. Some females grow manes.

:bigass:
 
Then I expect you to champion and defend colobus monkey drag shows any minute now.

In humans, however, this shit started with a Jew named Magnus Hirschfeld in the Weimar period. And we both know what that led to. Is that what you're rooting for? I'm not keen on seeing Round 2 of that, but that's where it's going. "Weimar Problems require Final Solutions." I didn't come up with that, but I'm not confident in saying it isn't true.
 
The Question said:
Then I expect you to champion and defend colobus monkey drag shows any minute now.

In humans, however, this shit started with a Jew named Magnus Hirschfeld in the Weimar period. And we both know what that led to. Is that what you're rooting for? I'm not keen on seeing Round 2 of that, but that's where it's going. "Weimar Problems require Final Solutions." I didn't come up with that, but I'm not confident in saying it isn't true.
Click to expand...
Jesus. You said mammals aren't transgender. I just showed three examples where they are. Scientists say xx,xy is a poor argument about transgender not being valid in humans.

Im beginning to think you're arguing for the sake of arguing.
 
jack said:
Scientists say xx,xy is a poor argument about transgender not being valid in humans.
Click to expand...
You mean 'scientists who are all in for the play pretend cult say'.


Transgenderism -- and it is, at this point, an -ism -- is every bit as fucking ridiculous as Young Earth Creationism. It's new age, 'woo'-ass, "magical thinking" bullshit. Everybody knows it, even those who defend it. Including you. You know that there's no more chance of some beetle browed 5 o' clock shadow sporting Cro-Magnon motherfucker wishing hard enough to be an actual woman than there is of him wishing himself into being a fucking fax machine.

It's play pretend horseshit. It's like a loonie in the nut hatch declaring that he's Napoleon Bonaparte and the French actually declaring him Emperor. It's coddling fucking crazy people. Well, the actual dysphoric ones. The rest are just following a trend for social clout.

Well, you play along with Fucking Crazy if you want to. I won't.
 
Last edited:
Oerdin said:
Ahh, the poor dear got his feelings hurt and is upset that other people care about factual reality. There are only two genders and no one can switch genders. Deal with it, sunshine.
Click to expand...
Like I said...Fuck you.

Our business is concluded.
 
The Question said:
You didn't actually believe you are a woman, though, do ya. That's the difference.

And, no, I don't think you get all 'got up' in misogynistic clown wear and go normalize that shit to kids.
Click to expand...
I don't believe I'm a woman that is true. But I'm totally going down to my local library this weekend in drag and read books to kids.
 
I may dress up & drive down there and join you. My foot longer might make a bulge in my skirt, but YOLO

:bigass:
 
The Question said:
You mean 'scientists who are all in for the play pretend cult say'.


Transgenderism -- and it is, at this point, an -ism -- is every bit as fucking ridiculous as Young Earth Creationism. It's new age, 'woo'-ass, "magical thinking" bullshit. Everybody knows it, even those who defend it. Including you. You know that there's no more chance of some beetle browed 5 o' clock shadow sporting Cro-Magnon motherfucker wishing hard enough to be an actual woman than there is of him wishing himself into being a fucking fax machine.

It's play pretend horseshit. It's like a loonie in the nut hatch declaring that he's Napoleon Bonaparte and the French actually declaring him Emperor. It's coddling fucking crazy people. Well, the actual dysphoric ones. The rest are just following a trend for social clout.

Well, you play along with Fucking Crazy if you want to. I won't.
Click to expand...
What about Scotsmen in kilts? Are they an affront to your fragile male ego, too? If it's nae Scottish . . . it's crap!!
 
The hell do you two want to go and scare the shit out of innocent little kids, for? Be like Jason Whore-hees and Freddie Jew-ger.

Nasty.

What did those kids do to deserve that?
 
The Question said:
The hell do you two want to go and scare the shit out of innocent little kids, for? Be like Jason Whore-hees and Freddie Jew-ger.

Nasty.

What did those kids do to deserve that?
Click to expand...
Scare kids? My nephews and nieces love when Auntie Dan makes a visit. Any kid that is scared by me is a future crybaby whiny snowflake.
 
Loktar said:
Scare kids? My nephews and nieces love when Auntie Dan makes a visit. Any kid that is scared by me is a future crybaby whiny snowflake.
Click to expand...
Uh huh, suuure. Bet they call you, "Mrs. Doubtfire" when you're not around, and they ain't bein' complimentary about it.

Okay, no, probably not, they're probably not conversant in '90s pop culture. But if they were, they would. :P
 
Ancalagon said:
Ah.

So using your logic Catholicism should be eradicated from public life as priests are 23.7x (to be clear that is a ‘x’ symbol meaning times, not a % meaning percentage) more likely to engage in child sexual exploitation than drag queens yes?
Click to expand...
Serious question: When you post, are you intentionally demonstrating how to make a terrible argument? Is your goal to see how many logical fallacies you can use to completely destroy your credibility? Because that's what you do. Every time. Red herring. Straw man. Actually, it isn't so much a straw man because then you'd at least try to make an argument supporting the way you're trying to derail the discussion. False analogy.

You've got a college degree or two, don't you? You should print up some of your posts and take them to the registrar's office. They should probably give your dad some of his money back.
 
Crap, I've gotten so used to his absolute garbage posts that I completely missed that he just makes up a claim with absolutely no evidence to back it up. C'mon Analcalgon, prove to us that "[Catholic] priests are 23.7x (to be clear that is a ‘x’ symbol meaning times, not a % meaning percentage) more likely to engage in child sexual exploitation than drag queens". Hell, prove that they're even 23.7% more likely. How many priests are there? How many drag queens? What is your benchmark for "child sexual exploitation"? And Some Guy With a Twitter Account is not a credible source. Even if he says he was once a Republican and has a Doctorate in Social Injustice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top