I actually thought when I edited it that Donovan wouldn't mind as I thought he'd posted it in a "ha, got it in before you guys way!" Obviously "stick to the fucking format" isn't a very good explanation as it's just a running joke we use throughout these threads. Obviously I shouldn't have edited it at all but I've acknowledged that I was in the wrong and hopefully it's resolved now. Eggs had nothing to do with it, he's just a nice man trying to defend me. But it was just one specific post in one specific thread and I don't see it as a sign of decaying free speech rights in the MF or anything and it doesn't have to be a big deal (even though I'm posting about it YET AGAIN.)
It's funny, it makes me think of a question I was pondering yesterday, which is whether or not to include Bond girls. But then I thought that Bond films are more "action/adventure" than either sci/fi or fantasy, so I decided not to. Thoughts?
It's funny, it makes me think of a question I was pondering yesterday, which is whether or not to include Bond girls. But then I thought that Bond films are more "action/adventure" than either sci/fi or fantasy, so I decided not to. Thoughts?
Bite me. She was an interesting character who proved to be a good long-term romantic match (and sometime duty-bound rival) for a Trek captain, something no other Trek captain had. She had more depth than half the female regulars in Trek shows.
Argue with me about Dorothy Gale or something. Kasidy is a totally valid choice.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.