jack
The Legendary Troll King
In order for him to say he had "won", he would have to admit to the duals. If he admits to the duals then he has to admit to having posted personal info on someone, a direct violation of the TOS, it isn't when the infraction happened, it's when it's decided by a mod to take action.
Cow saying he objected is the most blatant form of hypocrisy I can think of, given his actions when he was mod. Truth is no one really objects, or if they do it doesn't matter. Read the TOS, all that BS by the duals about Greg'spersonal info, and the fact tha Charles has used personal pics of mine in a shopped form without my permission and "crowed" about it, deserves the banning. So since I support the action based on the TOS, that negates the implication that anyone objects. Greg acted within the letter of the law...and I saw no "statute of limitations" on when an action had to be taken on the infraction.
Cow saying he objected is the most blatant form of hypocrisy I can think of, given his actions when he was mod. Truth is no one really objects, or if they do it doesn't matter. Read the TOS, all that BS by the duals about Greg'spersonal info, and the fact tha Charles has used personal pics of mine in a shopped form without my permission and "crowed" about it, deserves the banning. So since I support the action based on the TOS, that negates the implication that anyone objects. Greg acted within the letter of the law...and I saw no "statute of limitations" on when an action had to be taken on the infraction.